fork (2)

Doug's Oracle Blog

  • Home
  • Papers
  • Books
  • C.V.
  • Fun
  • Oracle Blog
  • Personal Blog

Jul 16: fork (2)

I don't know how this will go and it could be a bad idea, but I've been thinking about it recently. I've decided to fork the blog. Why?

Well, I'm aware that a lot of what I write is just gossip, rants and nonsense, basically. Part of me understands that can be perfect blog material. Another part never imagined this is how it would turn out and I admire blogs like Eddie Awad's, Jonathan Lewis' and Andy Campbell's that focus on technical content. Even those with more mixed content, like Howard Rogers or Tom Kyte deliver technical content in other ways, through their articles or forums. I'd prefer to do that via my blog and that 'Dougs Oracle Blog' title has annoyed me more and more over the months. I'd be surprised if it doesn't irritate others, too ;-)

I could see a few options for addressing what I see as a problem.

1) Stop dealing in trivia and stick to the technical stuff. The problem with that is that I actually quite like writing trivial nonsense and I think that's what people want to read sometimes. When I refer to trivia, I include things like conference reports, what I did on my holidays and industry news. It would require more self-control than I'm prepared to muster.

2) Use categorisation along with separate feeds to make it clear what's truly related to Oracle and what isn't. That could work, but I'd prefer that someone could arrive at the blog via a search engine and be able to browse through technical content without wading through the other stuff.

3) Have two blogs! Heh-heh .... one's not enough for me ;-)

I already think I've got it the wrong way around because I moved all of the vaguely technical posts to http://oracledoug.com/blog over the weekend to make a fresh start, but that's not where most feeds will point. Perhaps I should have started a new personal blog there and kept http://oracledoug.com/serendipity for technical stuff from now on. I'll mess around with it over the next couple of days and I'll consider any feedback regarding the best approach. Suffice to say, you shouldn't depend on feeds while I fiddle around with it, but all existing posts will remain at the serendipity location, whatever the final solution.

I hope that most readers use RSS readers (if you don't, you should) and it will just be a case of adding another feed to your reader and won't demand any more commitment on your part. In fact, I hope it will require less activity because anyone who's not interested in non-technical blogs can avoid them completely (and vice versa). Needless to say, The Boys were a little perturbed by this activity until they realised this could turn into a popularity contest that might teach me a lesson! We'll see.

It was interesting to go through all my past postings separating the technical from the rest. On the one hand, there's far too little technical content. On the other, it does exist and works better in isolation. Oh, and when I say technical, I don't expect it to be particularly deep because I'm more interested in helping people with day-to-day problems than trying to impress anyone. It'll probably end up more like dispatches from the DBA trenches than sermons from the mount, but I doubt I'll be able to avoid my opinions!

Hopefully it'll also serve as a self-inflicted kick up the backside (difficult though that might be to do for real).

P.S. Before anyone jumps in and leaves comments about the menu not being consistent, or characters being wrong in the migrated postings, rest assured I am mid-way through the exercise. I'm doing this in my spare time and it will not be finished today!
Posted by Doug Burns Comments: (29) Trackbacks: (0)

Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry

No Trackbacks

Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

#1 - bill thater 2007-07-16 20:18 - (Reply)

mutter..mutter...2 feeds ... mutter...mutter...done.;-)

#2 - Andy C said:
2007-07-16 21:50 - (Reply)

Your house. Your rules.

But surely the only decent reason for two blogs to to experiment with a different CMS. Or to start a Fanzine.

I bet you will find most readers subscribe to both blogs because they are interested in all your outpourings (technical and otherwise).

#2.1 - Doug Burns said:
2007-07-16 21:54 - (Reply)

Well, you hit on a couple of reasons.

First, I *might* try another CMS out, but certainly some different templates where the need to make code examples work isn't an issue.

Second, if I can stop my neurosis about whether something is 'valid' or not, I might post a wider variety on the non-Oracle blog. (Note, I'm not saying that it ever limited me, reading old blogs back, but it would be nice to not even think about it)

As I said, I'm not really sure it's a great idea myself (at times I think it's a stupid idea), but I decided it was worth a try in the short term.

#2.1.1 - Graham said:
2007-07-16 22:55 - (Reply)

... but don't listen to Andy, he's probably lost count of how many blogs he has now (I'm sure I have at least 4 feeds from him hanging around collecting dust)!

;-)

#2.1.1.1 - Doug Burns said:
2007-07-17 06:50 - (Reply)

LOL :-)

Precisely, but most of his are secret and experimental aren't they?

I did think about saying nothing at all but some bright spark (probably Andy, now I think of it) would have said 'what's going on with the blog, then?' ...

#2.2 - Doug Burns said:
2007-07-16 21:55 - (Reply)

Besides, I figured I needed two blogs to go with my three email accounts.

Sigh ...

#2.2.1 - Peter Lewis 2007-07-16 22:49 - (Reply)

... only three?!

#2.2.1.1 - Doug Burns said:
2007-07-16 22:52 - (Reply)

I was awfully proud of my one!

(Well, ok, usually a client/work one too, but that's just for work stuff)

#3 - Howard Rogers said:
2007-07-17 00:04 - (Reply)

Personally, I wouldn't have split the blogs. You are what you are, your blog is what it is, and sometimes that's techie and sometimes it's not. Regular readers already know that and have made mental notes accordingly.

#3.1 - Doug Burns said:
2007-07-17 06:47 - (Reply)

Believe me, that thought (almost precisely) went through my head.

The other thought was to just screw the nut and post more technical stuff.

We'll see, but I might well back-track at some point in future ;-)

#4 - Sidhu said:
2007-07-19 09:41 - (Reply)

Doug

I think, its good to seperate the technical and non-technical content to two different blogs.

I hope that most readers use RSS readers (if you don't, you should)

I tried with many RSS readers, but didnt enjoy much reading in that window.

Which RSS reader you use & like ;-) will try that :-)

Sidhu

#4.1 - Paul said:
2007-07-19 13:52 - (Reply)

Sidhu - I use FeedReader 3 and find it great. Built-in viewer is fine. but mostly I appreciate how I can take a days worth of posts with me in the taxi, scan through them and just "star" the ones I'll read in full later.

What tends to annoy me most now are the few feeds give very summarised text (sometimes no more than 'Hi, '!). Now I tend to ignore these posts unless the title is particularly interesting.

#4.2 - Doug Burns said:
2007-07-19 17:28 - (Reply)

Personally, I use netvibes.com which works for me. I also use Google Reader, but not as much. In some ways, I can see the attraction, but I prefer the look and feel of netvibes and the fact that it doesn't try to take over my browser and claim every feed!

#4.2.1 - Sidhu said:
2007-07-20 18:02 - (Reply)

Doug

I was just trying netvibes.com. The interface is really good. But I cant see something like Today's posts, yesterdays's posts. Is there anything like that [;)]

Sidhu

#4.2.1.1 - Doug Burns said:
2007-07-21 03:15 - (Reply)

Sidhu,

I suspect Google Reader might be closer to what you're looking for (of the ones I've used, which aren't many). Andy C also pointed out that Netvibes flickers away a bit.

But, there we go again ... I find something; it works; I don't hate it so I keep using it. I used to use Thunderbird, but wanted something I could use in a browser.

I just don't get this Web 2.0 thing at all, do I?

What I can say, though, is that I'd be utterly lost without an RSS reader. I can't imagine how I would find the time to surf around blogs.

#4.2.1.1.1 - Sidhu said:
2007-07-21 11:44 - (Reply)

Doug

I am almost in love with netvibes. Its simple and nice :-). That interface is really good.

Once I tried Google reader also, but there was problem with refresh of feeds. It was taking time. So I left that also. Will have a look once again :-)

Yea thats true. Its pretty difficult to keep track of all the blogs and more important where something new has been posted. I have seen myself sometimes, opening 12-15 tabs in a single window in Mozilla, then getting irritated and closing all :-(

So that way also netvibes is really good. It shows headlines from where one can see whats news.

I just did a new post on my blog & was really happy when it appeared on my netvibes page ;-)

Sidhu

#4.2.1.1.1.1 - Doug Burns said:
2007-07-22 12:58 - (Reply)

Sidhu,

I am almost in love with netvibes. Its simple and nice :-). That interface is really good.

Yes, I like it too. It does just what I need it to do (which isn't much) and I can see everything I need to on one screen. I'm sure there are lots of similar apps available, though ...

#4.3 - Sidhu said:
2007-07-20 05:35 - (Reply)

Thanks Paul & Doug

Well, I downloaded Feedreader3 its simple, just added 2-3 feeds. Will try in full-fledged manner.

Will try netvibes also. It looks good :-)

Thanks again
Sidhu

#5 - Paul said:
2007-07-19 14:02 - (Reply)

Doug, I can relate to the dilemma! (like I guess many people).

Think it comes down to how what "identity" you want your blog to assume.

As in, does you blog have an identity of its own, or is it meant to represent "you"?

Of course, if "your blog" == "you", then post it all in one place - the more diverse, the better (because only then would it even approximate "you").

OTOH technical/topical blogs I think tend to have an identity of their own (if only in the sense that they portray just part of who you are). If that's your intention, staying on-topic becomes more important otherwise you could potentially confuse and lose readers who can never figure out whether they should be following your blog at all ... you need to find another outlet for the other stuff.

just my 2c!

... and thanks for posing the question, because it made me think through the same problem as I realise I'm facing it right now too ...

#5.1 - Doug Burns said:
2007-07-19 17:31 - (Reply)

Very nicely put, Paul, I appreciate your thoughts.

Or, to put it another way, one is a diary (which people might not be interested in) and the other is a technical column in a magazine (which people might not be interested in!).

The comments I've had so far lean strongly towards a single integrated blog, but my feelings are for the split, or at least not calling it 'Dougs Oracle Blog' when a lot of the content is wildly off-topic!

#5.1.1 - Graham said:
2007-07-19 17:55 - (Reply)

I've been having a think about this entry adn wondered what I could add...

I run two blogs, a personal one and an Oracle (well Siebel) one. I started off with the personal one and because I'd always said I'd try and keep the technical bits out of the personal blog when I eventually got annoyed enough by certain things to want to write the technical blog it was fairly obvious to split them in two.

Looking at the Google Analytics stats for the two of them is quite interesting. If I look at the locations of readers in my personal blog I can just about name all of the readers, not all, but most of them... the same certainly isn't true of my technical blog, there is some crossover but it's by no means the same audience.

I do feel that the technical blog can be quite "dry" in comparison to the personal one and that I should put more humour in, but on the other side, I'm not entirely convinced that all of my audience would actually get half of it!

;-)

#5.1.1.1 - Doug Burns said:
2007-07-20 07:44 - (Reply)

I'm not entirely convinced that all of my audience would actually get half of it!

I wouldn't worry about that Graham, it works for Andy C ;-)

#6 - Andy C said:
2007-07-20 09:50 - (Reply)

Hmm. Graham's dual blogs do work well. I think that is because one is solely a personal blog/journal while the other is similarly solely focussed on a technical subject.

IMHO it would be odd to have baby photos intertwined with Business Requirements for SOA and may alienate the technical audience (and vice versa).

Now I'm on tenterhooks, wondering exactly what all this non-technical content Doug is storing up in 'Drafts' (music reviews, cuddly toy conventions, Celtic transfer gossip, Edinburgh by night, Flickr photo-albums, probing Web 2.0 reviews)

#6.1 - Graham said:
2007-07-20 10:05 - (Reply)

If it's Celtic transfer gossip it might be quite an empty blog ;-)

:::ducks for cover:::

#6.1.1 - Doug Burns said:
2007-07-21 03:11 - (Reply)

What is this - all-out assault?

Frankly, I'd be relieved if we had some out-going transfer news. At this rate, we'll have to lend Rangers our reserves when we're not using them.

#6.2 - Doug Burns said:
2007-07-21 03:09 - (Reply)

Now I'm on tenterhooks, wondering exactly what all this non-technical content Doug is storing up in 'Drafts' (music reviews, cuddly toy conventions, Celtic transfer gossip, Edinburgh by night, Flickr photo-albums, probing Web 2.0 reviews)

Oooh, you bitch!

I can't do comedy, but you've only had my Feyenoord story so far. There's still VVV Venlo, Schalke 04 and RAF Laarbruch vs RAF Rheindalen to come!

Oh, and some of us have *been* to the occasional music festival.

#7 - Dave said:
2007-07-20 17:25 - (Reply)

Can we now call you Doug "Two Blogs" Burns?

#7.1 - Doug Burns said:
2007-07-21 03:06 - (Reply)

Hey, I'm better looking than John Prescott! Not difficult, of course.

#8 - Sheeri said:
2007-07-26 03:46 - (Reply)

I use http://www.sheeri.com for my professional face and http://awfief.livejournal.com for my personal blog. I don't think I'm hiding the personal stuff, but when you search for my name you find the professional stuff first.

I don't mind if there's crossover, but some DB folks don't want to hear about my personal life, and many of my friends don't want to hear about my adventures with MySQL.

I think it's more natural to have 2 blogs for different 'faces' of yourself.


Add Comment

Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.
E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications.
BBCode format allowed
 
 

Statistics on Partitioned Tables

Contents

Part 1 - Default options - GLOBAL AND PARTITION
Part 2 - Estimated Global Stats
Part 3 - Stats Aggregation Problems I
Part 4 - Stats Aggregation Problems II
Part 5 - Minimal Stats Aggregation
Part 6a - COPY_TABLE_STATS - Intro
Part 6b - COPY_TABLE_STATS - Mistakes
Part 6c - COPY_TABLE_STATS - Bugs and Patches
Part 6d - COPY_TABLE_STATS - A Light-bulb Moment
Part 6e - COPY_TABLE_STATS - Bug 10268597

Comments

Doug Burns about 10053 Trace Files - Different Plan in Different Environments
Tue, 02.04.2013 08:57
You're welcome. Now I just nee d to pull my finger out and ac tually come up [...]
Howard Rogers about 10053 Trace Files - Different Plan in Different Environments
Mon, 01.04.2013 23:08
Makes a big difference, so tha nks for that! With two brow ser windows, o [...]
stelioscharalambides.com about 10053 Trace Files
Sat, 30.03.2013 16:28

Upcoming Presentations

Bookmark

Open All | Close All

Syndicate This Blog

  • XML RSS 2.0 feed
  • ATOM/XML ATOM 1.0 feed
  • XML RSS 2.0 Comments
  • Feedburner Feed

Powered by

Serendipity PHP Weblog

Show tagged entries

xml 11g
xml ACE
xml adaptive thresholds
xml ASH
xml Audit Vault
xml AWR
xml Blogging
xml conferences
xml Cuddly Toys
xml Database Refresh
xml DBMS_STATS
xml Direct Path Reads
xml Fun
xml grid control
xml hotsos 2010
xml listener
xml Locking
xml oow
xml oow2009
xml optimiser
xml OTN
xml Parallel
xml Partitions
xml Patching
xml swingbench
xml The Reality Gap
xml time matters
xml ukoug
xml ukoug2009
xml Unix/Shell
xml Useful Links

Disclaimer

For the avoidance of any doubt, all views expressed here are my own and not those of past or current employers, clients, friends, Oracle Corporation, my Mum or, indeed, Flatcat. If you want to sue someone, I suggest you pick on Tigger, but I hope you have a good lawyer. Frankly, I doubt any of the former agree with my views or would want to be associated with them in any way.

Design by Andreas Viklund | Conversion to s9y by Carl